Hm, I don't see this so much as mastering Photoshop, but mastering the art of drawing in general. Sure, Photoshop makes it easier, but still. Nevertheless, a good clip.
Steve113 - March 6, 2007, 15:29
Nice work - Shame about the subject matter. Lost is for Gays.
alexandurG - March 6, 2007, 15:51
fantasic drawing- master
Steve113-shame for you
Diputs - March 6, 2007, 17:05
Awesome!
They say that (guest) - March 7, 2007, 02:25
the one that know the most about how mutch you can do in photoshop only know 33%, i dont know how that goes thogether but it really sound strange, it means you can do shit loads of things with photoshop! :D
Pat (guest) - March 7, 2007, 03:12
Great!
Unimpressed (guest) - March 7, 2007, 09:23
Sorry to ruin it for you all but I wasn't at all impressed. Sure it is a nice drawing, but the clip takes AGES, even with time lapse, and the result still looks like... a drawing. Sure, it is a nice drawing, but I expected photorealism. Looking at the picture evolving for five long minutes and then ending still drawing-looking was a disappointment. And comeone, how many of you actually watched all 5 minutes without fast forwarding?
. (guest) - March 7, 2007, 12:07
Well I did.
... (guest) - March 7, 2007, 12:09
me too
PDawg - March 7, 2007, 14:02
its good but i give it a thumbs down because it is the man form the crappy lost
Santas (guest) - March 7, 2007, 17:35
Very cool... nice technics...
lawls (guest) - March 8, 2007, 01:16
Y HELO THAR TABLET
OHEMGEE (guest) - March 8, 2007, 04:56
There's hundreds of other things on say, deviantart.com that put this to shame. It's not bad- this just happens to show it in process. Far from *master* of PS
osiris1012 - March 9, 2007, 17:30
Good work and a good subject.
gummybearkiller (guest) - March 11, 2007, 23:34
brilliant
nuke21 - March 14, 2007, 00:08
All looked good until he added the stupid useless blue shade.
blindgaenger - March 17, 2007, 20:55
nuke21: yeah, exactly what i thought
Fake expert! (guest) - April 11, 2007, 23:44
F@KE! This picture is obviously photoshopped!
And Lost is too, it's a series, it is not REAL.
Draugovininkas - April 25, 2007, 08:52
Wathced all of it. expert, and you dare call your self an expert??? The drawing is not life like but then again only 5% of all drawings are. Maybe less. Don't know what's the big deal about drawing a person from lost (i didn't see the movie and i don't know what's it about) but saying it's bad just because of the person that's being drawn is just low intelect. What's your iq? 67?
. (guest) - April 27, 2007, 16:47
its not a movie its a programme in tv
Fake expert! (guest) - April 29, 2007, 11:02
What you fail to realize Draugovininkas, and this is what makes me believe that you're as dumb as a cow, is that I am merely joking.
Now even if this wasn't made clear, what amuses me is how you call me unintelligent when clearly I NEVER said that the drawing was bad or that the person drawn was WRONG. I only joke about the picture being "photoshopped" when in reality the movie is about a photoshopped image, random and funny. I then state that Lost isn't for real, when everyone in the world knows that most TV-shows (especially The 4400 and Lost, etc.) aren't, random and funny.
Your absence of intelligence is pitiful.
Nice drawing (guest) - September 1, 2007, 09:05
I think this is a great portrait, but in saying someone is a "Master" I was expecting something like Craig Mullins or any other digital art God. This is something most established designers can do, I can link some really impressive captured paintings by friends but check out Mullins for the moment at http://www.goodbrush.com/
Faakhir Rizvi (guest) - November 22, 2007, 07:53
nice work
RB (guest) - June 22, 2008, 17:46
...yeah...if this guy was any good he had used an Etch-A-Sketch instead...
41
12
Comments