very nice very nice, i wonder how the spec lense reacted with that many cycles ... .
Optimisten (guest) - August 17, 2006, 00:57
Cool vid, I like fraktals.. :) [brag] I've written a program that does that.. ^^ [/brag] Took like a minute to get a new frame with a 400x400 resolution though. ..And mine didn't go that deep either. :p But to be fair against myself, I didn't really try to make it..
dtfinch - August 17, 2006, 07:32
That's a lot of bits of precision.
TigerSlash-X - August 17, 2006, 20:56
cool
GenericName (guest) - August 18, 2006, 06:21
That must have taken forever to render. I guess it would be fun to scare anybody who was thinking about learning fractal geometry into changing their mind by showing them this video.
Enselic (guest) - August 18, 2006, 20:37
Awesome, that must be calculated using incredible floating point precision.
fractalfanatic (guest) - August 20, 2006, 11:12
www.cygnus-software.com
Gunstick (guest) - August 21, 2006, 13:35
you can calculate this using xaos. But I doubt it will zoom as deep. This video goes very very deep.
Gunstick (guest) - August 21, 2006, 13:36
forgot to say that xaos does it in realtime!
Gunstick (guest) - August 21, 2006, 13:44
well xaos stops to be realtime when you try to go further than 0:40 into the video. And that's then at 10000 iterations.
O_O (guest) - August 29, 2006, 20:17
wow..isnt it amazing that we all look like that inside??
Deleted0001 - August 30, 2006, 15:19
Boring!
wick (guest) - November 28, 2006, 14:56
it's boring when ur 10 years old
mrsjc (guest) - December 27, 2006, 22:31
stupid,, booring and ...................................................................................................................
toni+annie (guest) - February 10, 2007, 22:34
well we think that the foccalation of the first frame is ruined by the fact that the cpu was obviously condroned. Please dont be offended but next time try the occalation of 400 gigs to 4000 tri-bytes. This would give a better effect on the primisation of the follicular status. Ciao x *peace out bredrin*
21
17
Comments